Which is more Scientific:
Creation
+
Creator, or
Matter,
Time &
?????
The following are examples why Creation is based on
science. For example, did you know that ...
1. Almost any monkey could be taught to press a button or flip a switch: including one that turns on a TV, or computer, or that launches a rocket; however, that does NOT (in any way) indicate, nor support the assertion, that a monkey, or team of them could -- given enough TIME -- design and build a TV, or Computer, or a rocket ship: even in Trillions of years.
2. Water
hydrolyzes or breaks down DNA and proteins -- along with their building blocks:
unless they are surrounded by a protective membrane that strictly monitors and
regulates what goes in and what goes out: via a program that is stored within
the DNA molecule. 1
3.
Not even one homochiralic, or life-based, protein has been observed to form by
itself: apart from a pre-existing / living organism. This suggests that
proteins and life both came about at the same time.
4.
A
mycoplasma is one of the simplest bacteria known to man. It consists of
40,000 life-based proteins of 600 different types, and has DNA, RNA, ribosomes, and a
membrane. It's also a parasite
that requires a more complicated host organism to survive. And
those who believe that nature made it do so by faith: since such
creatures and/or their proteins have never been seen to spontaneously form, and
since a lone miraculous protein -- should one arise --
would simply decay back to the elements from
which it came: especially if water or oxygen were
present.1
5.
Cell
phones are extremely complicated and took teams of engineers years to Design,
yet they can’t divide or mate and produce baby cell phones, nor could nature
by itself have created them without the aid of an outside Intelligent force or Being.
The same thing could be said of all sorts of complex things that were made by
intelligent beings: i.e. mankind. In other words, life is more complicated
than anything man has yet to Design.
6.
It's
been said that the odds of higher life forms resulting from the forces of
nature are about the same as if a tornado swept through a junk yard and
assembled a functional Boeing 747.
7. The
ability of living things to reproduce has the markings of Design.
In fact, the self-replication process is so complicated that man cannot
duplicate it, much less Design or Create a synthetic ant.
8.
Except
for fireworks that are designed to blow up in specific ways, and then disintegrate,
explosions are not known to produce
order, and those who believe that we are the result of a Big Bang +
Time + Energy are simply touting their faith in the Big Bang
religion: a belief that something came from nothing, or that some
golf-ball-sized thing exploded and produced the order and complexity that we see
today.
9. Useful
languages require a method of making sounds and/or writing or storing messages and a means to
understand or decode what is being communicated. Human
languages involve thinking, speaking, hearing, and understanding, while
computer languages are created and written by intelligent programmers.
Not one was the result of random natural processes.
And those who suppose that the (three-dimensional) DNA language of life
simply arose by itself -- over millions, billions, and/or trillions of years -- base their belief on speculation, imagination, and
faith, rather than logic, observation, and/or science.
References:
1.
www.earthage.org/is_water_the_solution.htm
E-v-o-l-u-t-i-o-n with God over millions of years is really just S-l-o-w C-r-e-a-t-i-o-n.
See
also:
Your
Tax Dollars at Work:
against
Logic,
Science,
and
God
Evolution:
Science or Propaganda in Disguise?
Are Dinosaur Bones Millions of years Old?
A Closer Look at the Age of the Earth
The Odds of Evolution by Chance