Thinking about Dinosaurs Inside an Evolution-Only Box

The Truth About Dinosaurs

Videos on Dinosaur Blood Cells and Proteins? 

What if  Carbon 14 dates over 5,000 years old are unreliable?

Would "National Pornographic" or "(Don't) Discover" report it?   

Or would they say that such Dates and Dating Techniques are only invalid 
when used to "date" Coal Seams, Diamonds, and Unfossilized Dinosaur Bones,
but valid when "dating" Neanderthals, Mammoths, or Saber-tooth Tigers?  
See also this article on Carbon Dating of Dinosaur Bones

What if  Radiometric Dating has been exposed as a "pseudoscience" 
that is not (at all) reliable, objective, or "proven" to be accurate?  

What if a 220 million year "date" for a Human-like skull was rejected 
simply because it didn't "fit" well with evolutionary speculations?  

What if the younger date that was accepted, and then cross-checked by various
 other (purportedly "scientific") dating methods, was itself (after a 10-year controversy)
rejected -- simply because it also didn't fit well enough with  evolutionary 
Assumptions?  

Who is running the show?  

Will empirical science ever prevail against the highly speculative,  
wildly imaginative,  and subjective  "science" of evolution?  

Eventually the truth will come out, 
and those who promoted it will either be
laughed out of our Universities, and/or
  apologize for their ignorance, Lies,
and Cowardice .... simply because 
the Truth always (eventually) Prevails.

The case of  The KBS Tuff ?" / Radiometric Dating Exposed

See also "Radiometric Dating Involves at least Eight Untestable Assumptions"
To find it, Click Here and scroll down 

What if  “mainstream” geologists took a wrong turn 180 (or so) years ago with 
regard to their interpretation of the Worldwide physical evidences for a World 
Wide Flood and the Age of the Earth (and thereafter assumed they were on the 
right road)?  

What if at various locations around the world (either in or near coal seams) many 
thousands of trees have been found that are buried either upright, oblique or prostrate
 with regard to the surrounding strata  -- quite often  -- with their roots missing? 

Why is this little known fact ignored, or minimized by secular (old earth) geologists?  

Why is the one fossil tree with roots and rootlets (that is very 
questionably "rooted" in place of growth) more important to evolutionists than 
the other 49 that are missing most (if not all) of their roots and rootlets?

Wouldn't this also mean that (most likely) NONE of these trees grew in the 
places where they are now buried, and that the entire Geological Time Chart 
(with all of its Great Time Periods) 
(very likely)  
has nothing at all to do with long periods of time, but rather is 
simply evidence for different stages of a Single Eustatic Event?

Why is the popular theory of coal formation, that is still taught as if it were 
a fact, central to how the earth came to be thought of as "Billions of Years" old?

What if coal seams could be (and have been) dated by Carbon 14: meaning 
that all coals (no matter how far below the surface) "date" to less than 
50,000 years old? 

What if there is strong physical evidence that a 
Worldwide Flood  
took place in the not-too-distant past?

What if hundreds of civilizations had very similar "Legends" of a Worldwide Flood?

And then there is the Problem of Out of Order Fossils: a problem that...
  doesn't seem to be going away.
See Also: Human Remains All Throughout the Geologic Column

What if many thousands of Unfossilized Dinosaur Bones were 
found in sandy soil in northern Alaska?  

What if organic material is preserved in fossil wood that 
is (supposed to be) 300,000,000 years old? 

What if bacteria were preserved alive for Millions of Years?   

What if a Dinosaur Bone from Montana possessed organic molecules 
(such as collagen, fragmented DNA and proteins)  
and even little round things that looked "just like" red blood cells? 

What if these bones were not encased in amber, but rather in porous sandstone?

What if "Scientists" are lying when they say they "know" that 
Dinosaur bones are mythions of years old 
-- 
as opposed to admitting that they merely believe they are...
based on their almost blind faith in the 
Biologically and Mathematically Impossible
  theory of evolution.

Rumor also has it that some Dinosaur Eggs from China 
are so fresh that they smell like Rotten Eggs.

What if two different Dinosaurs are clearly described  in the 
Old Testament Book of Job -- Chapters 40-41?   

One of which had a tail like a "cedar tree," ate grass like 
an ox, and had leg bones that were like "bars of iron"?  

If dinosaurs and man existed at the same time wouldn't this mean 
that the Geological Time Chart -- along with its "mythions of years" 
of evolution -- is almost certainly wrong?  

What if many thousands of Ancient Stones and pottery 
pieces from around the world portrayed Dinosaurs?   

What if a 800-1000-year-old (unrestored) Temple in Cambodia has 
a carving of a Stegosaurus next to various other carvings of animals?

What are the Ica Stones?  

Why is this evidence for a recent extinction of the Dinosaurs virtually 
ignored by the Mass Media and popular "science" publications?

Could it be that they want evolution taught in all public schools -- 
even though the public overwhelmingly believes in a Creator and disagrees 
with how this subject is (still to this day) being force-fed to our children?

And even though it can be proven that there must be a Creator? 

Why are the beliefs of the half (of Scientists) who believe in evolution so much 
more important than the beliefs of the other half, or of the average person?  

And why (pray tell) are the beliefs of the (other) 50% of Scientist's 
who DON'T Believe 
in evolution virtually ignored by the American Media?

Could it be that the mass media is more responsible for this
(mass-deception)
than the "scientists" themselves? 

Could it be that the way the media "reports" on this, or by the facts they 
choose NOT to report on, has had a detrimental effect, not only on the perception
 of the public at large, but also on our courts and children, -- who are still being 
taught in public schools (as if it were a fact) that God doesn't even exist?  

What if many different ancient civilizations from around the world have
 very similar legends of large creatures that resemble dinosaurs?   

What about the "legend" of Beowulf?  Was he an actual person of history, 
or a made-up character?  See also Dinosaurs and the Bible.

What if a living dinosaur was found in the Congo?  
What are the chances of such taking place?

What are the 12 animals that make up the Chinese New Year?   
Do any of them have anything to do with dinosaurs?  

Hugh Miller's Letter to the Editor

Did Birds Evolve From Dinosaurs?

Dog Sized Mammal found in Dinosaur Strata

Home School Expedition uncovers a 
near complete Allosaur, 
with unfossilized wood mixed in with the bones

Beaver found in Jurassic (Dino) Strata

For many more articles on Dinosaurs and Man Living together see: 
Evidence that Humans and Dinosaurs Lived Together at the same Time